Update

Update: Well, no wedding bells just yet. The ruling came down as follows....

"Although we cannot find that a fundamental right to same-sex marriage exists in this State, the unequal dispensation of rights and benefits to committed same-sex partners can no longer be tolerated under our State Constitution....

To bring the State into compliance with Article I, Paragraph 1 so that plaintiffs can exercise their full constitutional rights, the Legislature must either amend the marriage statutes or enact an appropriate statutory structure within 180 days of the date of this decision....

We will not presume that a separate statutory scheme, which uses a title other than marriage, contravenes equal protection principles, so long as the rights and benefits of civil marriage are made equally available to same-sex couples. The name to be given to the statutory scheme that provides full rights and benefits to same-sex couples, whether marriage or some other term, is a matter left to the democratic process."

This is similar to the Vermont decision. While the ruling does not legalize same-sex marriage in NJ, it does require that ALL of the benefits of marriage be granted to same-sex couples. You can access the full 90-page (!) document here.

Let the wingnuttery commence. I'm going to go scoop up my boy and get us some haircuts. How's that for a crazy lifestyle?